Archives Play an Important Role by Preserving Photographic Originals

Ansel Adams said,  “Not everybody trusts paintings but people believe photographs.” The question is, should they?  A recent photo essay in the New York Times illustrates that photographs have been staged, retouched, and created in the dark room from multiple images since the 19th century.  In the era of digital photography altering images is even easier with sophisticated image editing software.

Photographic archives have an increasingly important role to play in maintaining photographic originals, like glass plate negatives, nitrate negatives, safety negatives, multiple versions of prints and raw camera files of digital photographs.   When archives have the negatives, proofs, raw files, or different versions of images they can show the public how a photograph actually looked before it was altered.

For example, this photographic proof was taken by the Jeffrey Manufacturing Company, a maker of mining equipment in Columbus, Ohio.  The “miners” are pictured with a Jeffrey coal loader.  The mine scene was  a painted background inside the Jeffrey factory.  The photograph, taken in 1918, was used for advertising.  Undoubtedly the factory wall was cropped from the picture before it was published.   Staging the scene was likely easier than taking photographs in a dark, dirty mine underground.


This image might appear to be an intimate portrait of President William McKinley and First Lady Ida Saxton McKinley.


However, a larger version of the picture reveals that the McKinley’s were at a dinner party in the home Senator Marcus Hanna, a polical ally of McKinley.   Hanna is seated at the head of the table.   Pictures of famous people were collectible and creating different versions of this image gave the photographer more products to sell.


Many changes to photographs are done for fairly inoccuous reasons such as improving the composition or removing an extraneous object.  However, as the New York Times story and examples from the Ohio Historical Society’s collections illustrate, the extraneous objects can be people and the portion of the image that is removed can be an attempt to deliberately obscure the truth of what is pictured.  Photographic images should not be viewed with outright skepticism, but should always be carefully analyzed.  And photographic archives should be highly valued for the truth that their collections can reveal.

Lisa Wood, Curator for Visual Resources

This entry was posted in collections. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Archives Play an Important Role by Preserving Photographic Originals

  1. ohiohistory says:

    This is an interesting analysis of why photographs are compelling and what information can be gleaned from them with trained eyes and without much written information provided. I would also add that historical images are reflective of the sensibilities and ideologies of the time in which they were taken. For example, the image of the McKinleys generally shows a great deal about the opulence of Victorian times and the objects that the wealthy felt were necessary for their lifestyle. If you could imagine weatlthy families looking at this image and noting the kind of china, the placement of the candelabra on the table and the walnut wood paneling of the room in which they are sitting; all things you would want to have in your house if you had money.

    In the cropped image, it appears that the president and his wife could be at a state dinner or another formal event; not at an intimate dinner party, which is an important distinction when you are trying to look presidential. Even the framing of the photograph provides a more formal presentation of the McKinleys.

    Thanks for provoking such good discussion on this topic!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s